Although all controls were living and competent when enrolled, some later became unable to participate and a proxy informant was used. We considered only pesticide use occurring before a reference date cases: age at PD diagnosis; controls: median age of PD diagnosis for cases within the corresponding age-, sex-, and state-specific stratum. For each pesticide, we determined ever use used one or more times and lifetime days of use determined for each farm job by multiplying years of use by average days of use per year, and then summing across jobs.
Self-reported pesticide use falling outside U. Family history of PD was positive if the subject reported PD in any first-degree relative.
We performed analyses for pesticide exposure groups classified by mechanism as complex I inhibitors or oxidative stressors, based on literature review Degli Esposti ; Krieger ; Uversky et al. Because men were the primary users of pesticides, we repeated analyses of ever use and duration of use restricted to men.
We performed analyses for rotenone and paraquat use truncated 5, 10, and 15 years before the index date to evaluate whether the association of PD with pesticide use was influenced by behavioral changes caused by undiagnosed disease. We also assessed the combination of paraquat plus any dithiocarbamate ferbam, mancozeb, maneb, metam sodium, vegedex, zineb, ziram , because previous studies reported an association of PD with the combination of paraquat and the dithiocarbamate maneb Costello et al.
We also repeated the primary analysis after including cases of atypical parkinsonism in our case group. For cases, we compared clinical features in persons who did or did not use paraquat or oxidative stressors as a group, or rotenone or complex I inhibitors as a group. We used SAS version 9. Screening process of cases and controls. Suspect cases were evaluated in home visits or from medical records, matched controls in home visits. The analyses reported here include PD cases and controls who provided complete information on pesticide use and application practices.
Cases and controls were similar for most characteristics assessed Table 2 , although cases were more likely to have impaired smell recognition or to have a family history of PD, and were less likely to smoke. To validate our approach to pesticide exposure assessment, we compared information on use of four pesticides collected at enrollment in the AHS with information collected for FAME. Results from analyses in men were similar to those in men and women combined Supplemental Material, Table 2.
Information on pesticides linked to complex I inhibition or oxidative stress, regardless of the number of users, is presented in Table 3. Most of the pesticides in the oxidative stressor and mitochondrial inhibitor groups were used infrequently, limiting individual analyses; but in general, use of these chemicals was more common in cases.
Association of PD with ever use of pesticides before diagnosis or reference date by mechanism. NA, not available. Analyses used logistic regression adjusted for reference age tertile, sex, state, and cigarette smoking. For men who used paraquat plus any dithiocarbamate 7 cases, 16 controls , the OR compared with use of neither was 2. Compared with never users, associations with PD were generally stronger among those who had used pesticides for more than the median number of lifetime days than among those who had used pesticides for fewer than the median number of days [Supplemental Material, Table 3 doi Adjustment for education or overall pesticide use did not appreciably alter effect estimates, nor did exclusion of 28 cases and 6 controls with proxy interviews or inclusion of 3 atypical parkinsonism cases.
We compared clinical features of cases who did or did not use paraquat or any oxidative stressor, or rotenone or any complex I inhibitor Table 4. Although postural reflex impairment appeared to be less frequent in those using either paraquat or rotenone, these differences were not statistically significant.
Clinical features did not otherwise differ between groups. We were unable to determine whether exposure to both paraquat and rotenone was associated with unique clinical features because only five cases reported use of both pesticides data not shown.
The pathogenesis of PD is thought to involve several critical abnormalities, each of which can be the result of genetic or environmental factors.
Chief among these abnormalities are dysfunction of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, particularly complex I, and the production of reactive oxygen species Henchcliffe and Beal To our knowledge, we have performed the first analysis of pesticides classified by presumed mechanism, rather than by functional categories e.
We found significant associations of PD with use of groups of pesticides classified as complex I inhibitors or as oxidative stressors, providing support in humans for findings from decades of experimental work.
In particular, PD was strongly associated with rotenone and paraquat, two individual pesticides used extensively to model PD in the laboratory. This study provides strong evidence of an association between rotenone use and PD in humans. PD developed 2. In the only other report of rotenone-like compounds and PD, use of organic pesticides such as rotenone in the previous year was determined for PD clinic attendees, who reported current use more often than did cases with other neurologic diseases Dhillon et al.
This information cannot be used to assess etiology, because the study evaluated associations with rotenone use that occurred after PD had been diagnosed. In contrast, in the present population-based study, we evaluated rotenone use before PD diagnosis in cases and during a comparable time period in neurologically healthy controls.
Rotenone is a plausible cause of PD because of its mechanism of action. Like 1-methylphenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine MPTP , a toxicant known to cause parkinsonism in humans, rotenone directly inhibits mitochondrial complex I Langston et al. In experimental models, both MPTP and rotenone cause selective injury of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, a key pathological feature of PD Greenamyre et al. Because rotenone is believed to have a relatively short environmental half-life and limited bioavailability, a relationship to human disease has been questioned Hatcher et al.
However, recent work in rodent models indicated that a temporally limited exposure to rotenone later caused progressive functional and pathologic changes in the enteric nervous system of rodents, mimicking changes found in human PD; as in PD, these enteric nervous system changes preceded central nervous system pathology Abbott et al.
Chronic rotenone exposure in the laboratory has been reported to have additional effects associated with PD pathogenesis, including ones similar to changes observed in monogenic forms of PD Henchcliffe and Beal Rotenone toxicity, therefore, provides a conceptual bridge, suggesting shared mechanisms for both sporadic and inherited forms of PD.
Although we report here findings for agricultural use of rotenone, the ubiquitous use of rotenone in both work and home settings that occurred until recently suggests that many people may have been exposed. Humans have used rotenone-containing plants as pesticides for centuries Cabras et al. Because rotenone is plant derived, it has been considered an organic pesticide and was commonly used as a household insecticide in home gardening and agriculture, and to kill fish.
For example, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation reported that almost 15, pounds of rotenone were used in , not including home use. Rotenone was withdrawn from use in the European Union in Schapira , after which time most uses were voluntarily cancelled in the United States U.
EPA Other agents associated with mitochondrial complex I inhibition remain in common use. For example, permethrin is used in nonagricultural settings as an insect repellant, including use of permethrin-impregnated fabric for military uniforms and recreational clothing Armed Forces Pest Management Board Our study also extends prior research on paraquat. Experimentally, paraquat produces subcellular changes associated with PD, including increased production of reactive oxygen species, alpha-synuclein aggregation, and selective nigral injury Dinis-Oliveira et al.
Previously, we found an association between paraquat use and PD in prevalent but not incident self-reported cases in the AHS Kamel et al. Cumulative use was not assessed in either study. Only a few other studies have assessed associations between PD and paraquat use Table 1. A study of cases and controls conducted in Taiwan Liou et al. Cumulative exposure was associated with greater risk, but paraquat use in the Taiwanese study was highly correlated with use of other herbicides.
Although the inconsistency of findings in human populations has been used as a basis for suggesting that paraquat is not associated with PD Li et al. Our findings, considered together with earlier results, suggest that paraquat use plays a role in human PD. Because paraquat remains one of the most widely used herbicides worldwide Frabotta , this finding potentially has great public health significance. Parkinsonism in humans due to high-dose exposure to toxicants such as carbon monoxide or manganese has characteristic clinical features including less prominent tremor, more prominent postural instability, symmetric distribution of signs, and poor response to dopaminergic therapy Tanner We did not observe such features in our cases.
Cases who did or did not use rotenone, paraquat, or groups of pesticides with similar mechanisms were generally similar, suggesting that PD associated with these agents is clinically typical and indirectly supporting a role for pesticide exposure in the etiology of typical PD. We did note an earlier age at diagnosis in users of oxidative stressors and a suggestion of this in paraquat users specifically. In FAME, pesticide exposure was not associated with PD in individuals with a family history, although numbers were small.
Interestingly, Hancock et al. Our study has some limitations. First, because most participants were exposed to many pesticides, we cannot confidently exclude effects of agents other than those studied or rule out the possibility that our results are attributable to combined exposures.
However, the associations that we observed remained after adjustment for overall pesticide use, and estimated effects of rotenone and paraquat were comparable after mutual adjustment.
Future investigations of combinations of pesticides and of other mechanistic groups will be important. Second, we could not use laboratory measures of pesticides or their metabolites to estimate exposure.
Such measures are not available for many of the pesticides we studied, and when available, they are poor predictors of past or long-term use. Thus, although we recognize that retrospective exposure assessment has limitations, it is often the best approach for studying lifelong exposure in an adult population in connection with a rare disease. Third, we included prevalent cases already diagnosed but still living at enrollment in the AHS; therefore, survivor bias is possible.
However, our results were similar when only those with shorter disease duration were analyzed. Additionally, we were able to investigate only persons willing to participate. Thus, PD cases or controls in this study may not have been fully representative of the entire population. However, participation was good, partially allaying this concern.
Finally, we selected pesticides presumed to act through specific toxic mechanisms, but for most pesticides there is very little information regarding toxic effects in humans, as most studies are directed toward effects on plant or animal pests. It is likely that we have misclassified some pesticides with regard to mechanism.
However, the likely effect of any misclassification would be to attenuate an association with pesticides grouped according to a common mechanism. This resulted in the contamination of the seven mile lake for the following six months.
Saturday, September 22, When and why Rotenone was developed, and its use. When Rotenone was deveoloped:. Rotenone has been used for centuries to kill fish for food,by people who live in areas where it is derived from, but was only officially registered by the U.
It has been used in North America since the s in Fisheries management as a piscicide. What Rotenone is used for:. Rotenone is mostly used to control aphids, raspberry beetles and sawflies, but it is rarely used as it can have adverse affects on beneficial species and pests.
It is also used to control ticks, caterpillars, flies, etc, and to kill lice in many shampoos for dogs, cattle and sheep. Rotenone is the most common pesticide used to kill fish populations. Poinsoned fish can be cured only by being put in untreated water.
The concentrate or the powdered root of Rotenone can be used in products, and because it is a naturally occuring chemical, it is permitted for some restricted use in organic farming.
Rotenone is rapidly broken down in sunlight, so it should be used in the evening as it is more effective. With the intention of restoring native fish or frogs, Rotenone is used in the removal of non-native fish species from small, concentrated areas. It is also used to control invasive species that may endanger the environment or the economy.
Why Rotenone is used: Because Rotenone degrades rapidly, it does not stay in the environment for long. It does not penetrate well through soil, and dissapears from streams quickly- therefore it does not pose a threat to ground water. The small amount of Rotenone used in fish control projects does not affect humans and mammals, and when Rotenone is used according to the directions on EPA-approved Rotenone product labels, there are no known health impacts on human health.
These factors contribute to why Rotenone is used. Rotenone advertised as a pesticide. The above fish was killed by the toxin Rotenone. Physical properties and description! What is it?
Rotenone is one of many metabolic toxins. The concentrate or the powdered root of Rotenone can be used in products, and because it is a naturally occuring chemical, it is permitted for some restricted use in organic farming. Rotenone is rapidly broken down in sunlight, so it should be used in the evening as it is more effective.
With the intention of restoring native fish or frogs, Rotenone is used in the removal of non-native fish species from small, concentrated areas. It is also used to control invasive species that may endanger the environment or the economy. Why Rotenone is used: Because Rotenone degrades rapidly, it does not stay in the environment for long.
It does not penetrate well through soil, and dissapears from streams quickly- therefore it does not pose a threat to ground water. The small amount of Rotenone used in fish control projects does not affect humans and mammals, and when Rotenone is used according to the directions on EPA-approved Rotenone product labels, there are no known health impacts on human health.
0コメント